I like to drive 5 under the speed limit, in the right lane of course. I don't have to worry about swerving through traffic, slamming on my brakes, and generally jockying for position just to shave 30 seconds off of my 20 minute drive.
If you drive 60mph for 20 minutes, you will go 20 miles. If you drove 65mph, then you would travel the same distance 1 minute 32 seconds sooner. At lower speeds, the effect is bigger, e.g. going 45 instead of 40 saves 2:13, and 35 instead of 30 saves 2:51. If my math is right, to only lose 30 seconds by going 5 under for 20 minutes, you would have to be going 195 in a 200.
I live in a rural area with a lot of straight/open roads with visibility and little traffic. Driving 98 mph (since 100 is a felony here lol) shaves nontrivial time off my trips vs. the speed limits which are far too low anyway.
If it’s okay for you to drive 10mph over the speed limit then it’s also okay for me to drive 28mph over. Laws are just words written by people who are irrelevant to me. Reality is about risk vs. reward.
Same, well, I’ll do the speed limit. But the end result is the same. I get to where I’m going without stressing over navigating around aggressive drivers. They tend to avoid the right lane anyway.
If my travels are so time sensitive that a couple minutes will make or break it the. I’m planning things wrong well before I leave the house.
I find right lane driving dangerous. Every week I see drivers slow down or come to a complete stop on the acceleration lane, others are risking it all to make their exit.
I grew up around the LA area and found that was common under a short interval but not for a long one. I had a diesel & sometimes tried to see how high I could keep the mileage on a tank (record was 52mpg), and one thing I noticed was that the guys blowing by at 90 were just burning cash: they’d fly by but then stomp on the brakes due to traffic over and over again, while I was having a much less stressful time going the average speed and rarely even touching the brakes.
Posted limit detection seems reliable in existing cars, both self-driving and not; is there some reason to believe this will be any less reliable than other safety technologies?
I live in Boston and my car’s HUD displays this information (speed limit and such). Sometimes it gets it wrong despite living in a major city center. Once my car even alerted me when I was going the wrong way on a one-way — except that I wasn’t. I can only imagine in deep suburbs / rural it is even less reliable.
It sounds like you're describing a system based on GPS and map data, not one of the systems that read the actual signs posted as you drive by them. The only problems I've had with the speed limit sign reader in my car are conditional speed limits (e.g. school zones during certain hours, truck-specific limits). Otherwise, they're just limited by the prevalence of the physical signs.
Even reading the signs is non-trivial, I drive several stretches of road where an access road runs parallel to a highway, and the 20mph lower speed limit signs for the access road are clearly visible from the highway and only slightly farther off the shoulder than the correct signs.
With clear conditions and no obstructions, yes, but my model Y frequently doesn't pick up the right speed limit, because: fog/rain/snow, glare, obstructed by another vehicle, defaced sign, no sign, non standard sign(eg variable speed limit sign in school zone).
There's a sign indicating the default speed limit in my town, 25mph, with some extra text that anyone who can read will realize it's indicating the default speed and is not a speed limit sign. But otherwise it looks exactly like a speed limit sign, and it sits in the middle of a 50mph zone. Apple and Google Maps both tell me the speed limit is 25mph for about 1/4mile until the next sign indicating 50mph shows up. I have been told it trips up Teslas (but don't have one and haven't driven one here so cannot personally confirm).
It'll be fun to have everyone's car slow down suddenly to match this non-existent speed limit, going from 50-60mph down to 25-35mph.
Right. Here the databases are wrong so the GPS data will indicate 25mph and the sign looks like a speed limit sign so posted sign identification will likely be tripped up (again, based on reports from Tesla owner friends and colleagues). So for 1/4 of a mile on a 50mph road cars that automatically enforce the speed limit will be screwing up.
That sounds pretty unique to me; I've done a few 1000+ mile road trips across the US and have never run into a sign that looks like a speed limit but isn't actually one. The closest thing would be a yellow advisory sign, but those don't look like speed limits.
(This sounds like the kind of thing you should report to either your state or county -- AFAIK every state maintains a DB of posted limits with geofences, and correcting them is generally a high priority for ticketing reasons.)
Do you have an example? Not that I don't believe you; it just seems nuts to me that any state would have a sign that looks almost exactly like a speed limit but that isn't one.
For the record: I've gone through the length of MA a couple of times (NY to Boston), and have never noticed these. But maybe that's because I thought they were all speed limits.
That road, Concord Ave, is posted as a 35 or 40 mph road for its length. (The MassDOT GIS database lists that first segment in Lexington as having a 40 mph speed limit, object_id = 395024.)
I believe a casual sign-reader could easily see the default sign and mistakenly conclude the speed limit on the pavement they are on is 25 mph. If I was stopped for 30 in the vicinity of any of the default limit signs I posted, I really, really like my chances to have it dismissed.
Given that GPS gets confused and thinks you're on surface roads when you're on the highway and vice versa, I don't see how this will always work. In dense urban areas there are often multiple layers of roadways going the same direction with very different speed limits. Also basic issues like GPS errors because of tall buildings or foliage cover can easily confuse systems such that you look like you're 100's of feet away from your actual position.
