They don't straight up call for the extermination. Lol. The whole text is about abolishing protections granted by gender identity in a law and practice. It is based on the presumption there no such thing as gender identity, as recognized by the UN, most of the medical and psychology community, and advocates for manifestation of their own ideology - therefore implicitly abolishing transgender people legally, and effectively by restricting medical care and access existential resources.
But you know all that. Made an account just to spread some doubt. I wonder, if it's all that harmless and good, why not use your primary account?
No, it's about protecting women's sex-based rights. Having every point in the declaration enacted in law and policy would abolish no-one.
Men could still claim to be women and present themselves in a feminine manner if they so desire. There's nothing to prevent their freedom of belief and freedom of expression. The difference is that this wouldn't entitle them to access female spaces, and indeed would not grant them any special privileges under the law.
This isn't abolition, just like separation of church and state doesn't abolish religious folks, with them being free to practice their beliefs within their own communities of like-minded people. Same principle should apply to 'gender identity' beliefs.
If you disagree, please cite those parts of the declaration that you believe shows otherwise.
But you know all that. Made an account just to spread some doubt. I wonder, if it's all that harmless and good, why not use your primary account?