Exactly. We always tend to blame the purchaser, but why not the seller? If their... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		itsoktocry on Feb 7, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: How Condé Nast bought and destroyed Pitchfork Exactly. We always tend to blame the purchaser, but why not the seller? If their business was good and they cared about the product, why sell? And if the business was bad, can't blame they buyer, either.

Loughla on Feb 7, 2024 [–]

To your second question: ethics, it turns out, aren't as powerful as a mountain of cash to ski down like Scrooge McDuck.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact