Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But there are AIs made to self-correct that they aren't AI. Humanizing their work. Likewise If I use AI to give me a blueprint of an idea, but I use my brain and methodologies to "reverse-engineer" it, how is this even enforced.

I doubt someone submitting to the USPTO is going to include "AS A LLM" somewhere in the submission lol.



And people who poison their spouses generally try to make it look like an accident. No law is perfectly enforceable but that is a secondary question to what should be the law.


The requirement for a patent is that it is novel and non-obvious.

If a "person having ordinary skill in the art" can create it, it's not novel. If anyone with a ChatGPT subscription can create it, it's "obvious".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_having_ordinary_skill_i...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: