> If someone challenged your patent, they can try to prove that you used an AI.
That not enough, they also have to prove that the AI did most of the work. From the article:
> On Tuesday, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) said that to obtain a patent, a real person must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention
This seems logical; it would be foolish (and impossible!) to completely forbid people to use AI.
That not enough, they also have to prove that the AI did most of the work. From the article:
> On Tuesday, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) said that to obtain a patent, a real person must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention
This seems logical; it would be foolish (and impossible!) to completely forbid people to use AI.