Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am somewhat amused by all of the "copeelot bad" articles, and I dearly hope they keep proliferating, so that those of us who enjoy its frankly insane productivity boost get to stay ahead of the competition. I perceive no quality/reliability drawbacks in my own code. If anything, the ability to iterate more quickly makes my code better than ever.

It's a skill issue. (You had it coming.)



> I perceive no quality/reliability drawbacks in my own code.

How can you be sure that doesn't say more about you than it does about copilot?


I'm pretty sure, as I constantly judge and monitor the quality of my code. But thanks for immediately disregarding my personal experience and inserting your own uninformed prejudged assessment, random internet guy.


> thanks for immediately disregarding my personal experience and inserting your own uninformed prejudged assessment

Isn't that exactly what your toplevel post is doing? Physician, heal thyself!


I hesitate to engage in this hopelessly fruitless discussion, but the answer is no. I don't even express my opinion of the article, arguably barring one humorous phrase that refers to the currently-fashionable wave of Copilot criticism. I don't mind the article. It's actually pretty well-written. None of this is incompatible with my statement that in my experience, Copilot lets me do my job better. Time to get off the internet, physician.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: