This same duty was there already for decades and it didn’t prevent them from destroying the environment. I don’t think it’s the gotcha argument you think it is. In the end their growth was bigger than any lawsuit.
If the growth was bigger than the lawsuit, then from the corporations point of view, the earlier executives made the right decisions.
We were talking about aligning interests of executives and long term shareholders. You seem to be talking about aligning interests of those shareholders and interests of the environment or so?
That's an important topic, too, but it's not the same.