> Many assumed that ShotSpotter coverage was concentrated in disadvantaged parts of the city, an unsurprising outcome but one that could contribute to systemic overpolicing.
Also
> Conversations recorded by ShotSpotter sensors have twice been introduced as evidence in criminal trials.
Exactly, instituting pervasive audio surveillance is bad even if it's rarely used in court, because it can and will still be used for parallel construction.
Also
> Conversations recorded by ShotSpotter sensors have twice been introduced as evidence in criminal trials.