> I'm not sure why you think that, given the paper being linked to was co-published by people from four universities and apparently no corporations?
That doesn't imply their work doesn't also serve capital and private equity, which it trivially does. Otherwise their definition of terms would be meaningful to the median human.
That doesn't imply their work doesn't also serve capital and private equity, which it trivially does. Otherwise their definition of terms would be meaningful to the median human.