Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

80% of music is familiarity, 20% novelty, yet the majority of peoples' time goes into getting the 80% down so that they can add their 20%.

Look at current music production and compare it to past. Older music seems so much simpler. It was so much easier to come up with that 20% 'novel' when pop/recorded music was new. Ironically I think AI freeing people to focus on that 20% is going to add a lot of creativity to music, not reduce it.

I say this as someone who hates the concept of AI music. I'm actually really excited to see what it enables/creates (but I don't want to use it, even though I really could use it for vocals that I currently pay others to do for me).

I'll be here making my bad knockoffs of bad synth pop bands having fun and taking weeks to do 5% of what kids these days will start off as their entry point, with my 20% creativity ignored because my music sounds 'off' when I can't get the 80% familiar down.

People thought synthesizers were the end of music, yet Switched on Bach begot Jean Michel Jarre begot Kate Bush and on and on.



I would agree when AI gets to a point where it's possible to do that 20%. It is just not possible yet to combine it in such ways. Right now you basically get whatever music, but there's no way to add that 20%. Same with image/video generation. AI advancements have obviously been amazing and far beyond what I would've expected, but there's still ways to go.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: