This is how we know it wasn't sponsored. If a reviewer never has negative reviews, then it's safe to assume they always get sponsored and reviews are not truthful or honest.
I think there is another meta-observation here, that some people are too sensitive to anything even remotely negative. I think balance is more important than always being positive for the sake of being positive. Sometimes products do suck, and it should be expressed at some capacity. It's up to people to understand it is an opinion and to adjust their expectations accordingly.
I think there is another meta-observation here, that some people are too sensitive to anything even remotely negative. I think balance is more important than always being positive for the sake of being positive. Sometimes products do suck, and it should be expressed at some capacity. It's up to people to understand it is an opinion and to adjust their expectations accordingly.