Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sweet! Thanks for sharing. A prior implementation had HyDE running on user searches, but I found the results to be hit-or-miss depending on the query type.

I definitely want to re-explore that though; I think it should be possible to do so a lot more rigorously now that I have a better sense for what people want to search for.



Relatedly, the "Follow up queries" in the righthand floating insert are an attempt at finding a decent balance between recovering from failures & giving users enough control on the queries themselves :) See https://hackersearch.net/search?q=postgres+clustering&period...


you should really use this visibility to get a thumbs up / down near each result and use that as a validation set :D


Totally! I've come to deeply dislike thumbs up/down UXes, so I'm collecting that by recording clicks on results!




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: