Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Kubrick’s film simplified the psychological depth and literary nuances of Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel, adapting its themes and character dynamics to fit both the cinematic form and the censorship norms of its time. Constrained by the Hays Code and societal taboos of the 1960s, it toned down the explicitness of the sexual elements of the story. The was more overt humor and satire in the film, partly as a way to address the censorship regulations of the time. This approach changes the tone from the intensely personal and tragic to something lighter and more accessible, though still deeply disturbing.

Note that Nabokov was credited as the screenplay writer for the movie (Kubrick is uncredited). https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056193/fullcredits/



The criticism seems pretty fair. Not sure how filmable the book is especially given the constraints of the time.


The constraints of today would be much worse. I'd go so far as saying that making even Kubricks version today would be impossible.


That may be fair. Arguably different constraints. But would probably be pretty radioactive especially with a Lolita at an age faithful to the book.


How does that compare to 1997 "Lolita" with Jeremy Irons?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: