Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Didn't the model ever fail to generate realistic-looking content?

If I don't know better I'd think you just cherry-picked the prompts with the best-looking results.



What you see there is a product, not the scientific contribution behind it. Consequently, you see marketing material, not a scientific evaluation.


Unfortunately also the majority of scientific papers for eg. image generation have had completely cherry-picked examples for a long time now.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: