Something clicked when he was saying that SendGrid and Mailchimp are clean, and it remained till the end.
Email born as internet, something decentralized. But it is getting harder and more complex to have your own mail server, because you have to comply with a lot of requirements of major mail providers. For big scale servers, and commercial mass sending companies ("legal spam") they can afford to comply with all those requirements. And about ("not legal") spam and malware senders, or they don't care if they reach a limited set of target, or the reward is high enough to try to trick the system.
So the smaller mail servers, without so many users, or without so knowledgeable maintainers, if any, are getting expelled from the game by both bad and big players, some just move their email administration to some of the big providers (and privacy and territorial requirements may be a problem here). What the article proposes is another change to push things in the same direction.
And, for good and bad, some of the present use cases may be harmed by this proposal too, like devices and other simple notification services, or mailing lists.
It's the same on social media and the Internet at large, until the Elmo's tantrum accidentally popularized Mastodon. Sure, you don't have to do anything to be visible in a web browser (except you do, since you need a domain name and a Let's Encrypt certificate) but you have to obey Google's rules to be searchable at all, for example, and everyone's just browsing the same big websites all the time except when they click on an outlink, so you have to go to those websites and post outlinks to yours if you want any traffic, which is likely to get you banned for self-promotion even if it was something people actually wanted to read.
Basically everything's centralized now because bad money drives out good, and I don't have any ideas to fix it. It may be fixing itself to some extent as some CEOs keep banning their anchor users in strange tantrums.
Email born as internet, something decentralized. But it is getting harder and more complex to have your own mail server, because you have to comply with a lot of requirements of major mail providers. For big scale servers, and commercial mass sending companies ("legal spam") they can afford to comply with all those requirements. And about ("not legal") spam and malware senders, or they don't care if they reach a limited set of target, or the reward is high enough to try to trick the system.
So the smaller mail servers, without so many users, or without so knowledgeable maintainers, if any, are getting expelled from the game by both bad and big players, some just move their email administration to some of the big providers (and privacy and territorial requirements may be a problem here). What the article proposes is another change to push things in the same direction.
And, for good and bad, some of the present use cases may be harmed by this proposal too, like devices and other simple notification services, or mailing lists.