Thanks, I missed the edit window to fix that to read: no contemporary observations,[0] though thanks to you I now realize even that might be not correct.
Given your research on these papers, do you think that this is still an object worthy of closer observation with even more modern tools?
Not an astrophysicist by any stretch of the imagination, but it's definitely an object that's worthy of close research. People are for sure doing that research as well. It takes time to produce serious scientific research though.
https://www.nature.com/articles/189739a0.pdf
Or perhaps
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/477/3/3791/4964763?lo...
Or maybe you mean
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02702326
Ok sure but there's definitely nothing like
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11963-008-1005-7
or
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/127965/pdf
or
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-09994-8_43
or ...
There are hundreds of contemporary analyses of that star. Just search for HD 101065 and you'll find tons and tons of them.