An actual answer aside, why are you focusing (it seems) on either WA or NV? I'm sure you have your reasons, but if it's a state-tax-rate based reason, it would be a poor choice to optimize for this based on the fact that you will, as a core premise to your decision, have no income.
There are a lot of cheaper places in california you could move to if you just wanted to get away from the COL of SF.
I don't know what your monthly spend is, but there are income levels where you'll see 0% capital gains at both the state and federal level. Also remember that you'll only pay the tax on the _gains_ (ie, taking your cost basis into account).
Moving out of a state for avoid a low-single-digit tax on _gains only_ seems like it may be an over-optimization, but you'll have to look at your specific situation.
RSUs are taxable on vesting, and California wants its piece of that, if any of the vesting happened while you were a resident or working in California. But after they vest, they're just stock, and when you sell stock, California considers the capital gains to be sourced to your state of domicile.
If the OP was being loose with terminology, and the 'RSUs' to sell already vested, there's no California tax due on sale if they've moved out of state before the sale.
There are a lot of cheaper places in california you could move to if you just wanted to get away from the COL of SF.