You list factory farming and climate change, and say they're bad. I agree. You say data and science support your statements. You don't list the data or science. But moreover, you don't
even mention the virus which is the topic of this thread or attempt to tie it through any data to the things you list in your post. In fact, the spread is H5N1 to mammals is largely unrelated to any human activity. So it's hard to know to which data or science you're referring, and I suppose people are supposed to come to their own conclusions. But as I said, I find that these types of posts detract from and derail useful conversations on this topic.
Again, this article doesn't mention H5N1, avian flu, etc. As with your initial comment, it's untethered from any useful discussion about this topic. It can serve as total absolute verification of your statements about farming practices, but it still does nothing for a conversation about the mutations necessary for h5n1 to go airborne between humans. So back to my original point, I think these kinds of comments serve to derail technical and useful conversations by injecting broad political/social statements that serve little purpose except to demo the bonafides of whoever posts them first.
