Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure, people are happy at the moment with a diet they've been on for up to 2 decades..

Meanwhile, child development under this diet would be child abuse given how little we know.

We know that people who skip certain vegetables have heightened risk of cancers, those vegetables contain chemicals not in meat.

We can conclude from the study that a vegetarian diet is competitive with an omnivore diet, maybe a little better, maybe a little worse.

From this I would assume that vegetables themselves are an important factor that was a free variable in the studies with vegetarians getting more but not necessarily better quality.

Thus vegetables matter a lot to longevity, and meat is filler that may or may not have aspects directly killing you like all the other non vegetable filler and poorer nutrition portion of vegetables.

You can't get to absolutes with the low quality of nutrional studies or meta studies across them.. But you can get to a Bayesian estimate of how poor a gamble people are making on things like excluding a whole category where some reasonable conclusions occurred within the category.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: