Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting, hasn't ECDSA been around way too long for possible patents to still be a concern (due to either being expired or prior art long predating their filing date)?


It's specific to ECDSA recovery, where instead of using a pubkey and message to validate a signature you use a signature and message to recover the pubkey, so the age of ECDSA isn't particularly relevant in and of itself.


Huh, interesting! I somehow assumed that that fact would be obvious enough to implementers for there to be prior art. Do you have any more details?


> obvious enough to implementers for there to be prior art. Do you have any more details?

I haven't made any comment in this thread on its validity. :)

US8788 827B2




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: