19 potential violations, most of which were mislabeled and unlabeled things or poor storage habits and addressed (meaning they aren't violations).
The rest of it was things being managed under state/local rules that should have been managed under federal rules which Apple still has time to fix and make them not violations.
I do not think that is reasonable to believe that because a report has some mundane findings that it indicates that the whole report should be dismissed.
I do not think that can be so confidently asserted entirely one way or another with the information we have now, unless we have in our midst someone who is an expert in reading EPA reports.