>I don't understand people who think the Sacklers are villains who destroyed lives, but Purdue should continue operating more-or-less as-is. Which is, I think, the conclusion from this settlement. If this is you, can you help me understand? Do you think there is/was a realistic way to prescribe opioids routinely and safely?
As GP noted, that is not the conclusion of the settlement - not even close. If you want to better understand comments on this page, perhaps reply to them asking for clarity?
>I don't understand people who think the Sacklers are villains who destroyed lives, but Purdue should continue operating more-or-less as-is. Which is, I think, the conclusion from this settlement. If this is you, can you help me understand? Do you think there is/was a realistic way to prescribe opioids routinely and safely?
As GP noted, that is not the conclusion of the settlement - not even close. If you want to better understand comments on this page, perhaps reply to them asking for clarity?