PS. What the article means by "mess" (in context) is the article's entire gist, that is: "Things have evolved, but they have done so in a way that is ..."
... wrong, counteranimical to the web's "original purpose", opposed to user-interests, etc., etc., ...
... however one would want to define all those things.-
Personally, I think the description the author makes of then vs now, has merit.-
Granted, that is, I agree.-
PS. What the article means by "mess" (in context) is the article's entire gist, that is: "Things have evolved, but they have done so in a way that is ..."
... wrong, counteranimical to the web's "original purpose", opposed to user-interests, etc., etc., ...
... however one would want to define all those things.-
Personally, I think the description the author makes of then vs now, has merit.-