Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bell Labs did use UNIX, C and C++, otherwise we would be luckly using safer environments.


It doesn't seem that they ever really used Plan 9, though. Are you trying to imply that Bell Labs was just few trick pony, or what? I'm still not clear on what connection your story about Go/Limbo/Oberon-2 has to the topic at hand. It seems you forgot to include the conclusion?


The Plan 9 guys are UNIX guys.

Punchline is without Google's moat, Go would have gone the way of Plan 9 and Inferno.


> The Plan 9 guys are UNIX guys.

Who are also the Go guys, but we already know that as it was already talked about much earlier in the thread. If you have some reason to return to that discussion, let it be known that you have not made yourself clear as to why.

> Punchline is without Google's moat, Go would have gone the way of Plan 9 and Inferno.

And that relates to the topic at hand, how? I am happy to wait. No need to rush your comments. You can get back to us when your conclusion that connects this all back to what is being talked about is fully written.


"Including Bell Labs alumni. They used their time to create Go. If that isn't game changing, perhaps Bell Labs was also a product of its time"

Failed twice to create anything else, only succeeded yet again thanks to Google moat and a set of lucky events caused by Docker and Kubernetes rewrite in Go, followed by their commercial success.


Bold claim that Go succeeded. A couple of software projects used by a tiny fraction of the population (hell, a tiny fraction of the software development population!) is of dubious success. Just about anyone's pet language can achieve that much. What sees you consider it to be more?

Also interesting that you consider UTF-8 to be a failure. From my vantage point, that was, by far, the most successful thing they created. Nearly the entire world's population is making use of that work nowadays. Most people can only dream of failing like that.

That conclusion, though... We still have no idea what this has to do with the topic at hand. Again, don't let me make you feel rushed to get your replies out. I am happy to wait until you are complete in writing that.


If this isn't successful, I wonder what is,

https://landscape.cncf.io/


Given that you don't consider UTF-8 to be success, perhaps nothing is?

Explaining what any of this has to do with the topic at hand is definitely not a success. Is this supposed to be your admission that you have no idea what you are trying to say?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: