Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> You do not deploy anything, ever on your entire production fleet at the same time and you do not buy software that does that

I am sympathetic to that, but its only possible if both policy and staffing allow.

for policy, there are lots of places that demand CVEs be patched within x hours depending on severity. A lot of times, that policy comes from the payment integration systems provider/third party.

However you are also dependent on programs you install not autoupdating. Now, most have an option to flip that off, but its not always 100% effective.




> I am sympathetic to that, but its only possible if both policy and staffing allow.

We are not talking about small companies here. We're talking about massive billion revenue enterprises with enormous IT teams and in some cases multiple NOCs and SOCs and probably thousands consultants all around at minimum.

I find it hard to be sympathetic to this complete disregard of ownership just to ship responsibility somewhere else (because this is the need at the of the day let's not joke around). I can understand it, sure, and I can believe - to a point - someone did a risk calculation (possibility of crowdstrike upgrade killing all systems vs hack if we don't patch a CVE in <4h), but it's still madness from a reliability standpoint.

> for policy, there are lots of places that demand CVEs be patched within x hours depending on severity.

I'm pretty sure leadership when they need to choose between production being down for an unspecified amount of time and taking the risk of delaying (of hours in this case) the patching will choose the delay. Partners and payment integration providers can be reasoned with, contracts are not code. A BSOD you cannot talk away.

Sure, leadership is also now saying "but we were doing the same thing as everyone else, the consultants told us to and how could have we have known this random software with root on every machine we own could kill us?!" to cover their asses. The problem is solved already, since it impacted everyone, and they're not the ones spending their weekend hammering systems back to life.

> However you are also dependent on programs you install not autoupdating. Now, most have an option to flip that off, but its not always 100% effective.

You choose what to install on your systems, and you have the option to refuse to engage with companies that don't provide such options. If you don't, you accept the risk.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: