"I ultimately believe that OpenAI in its current form is untenable."
Followed by a bunch of reasons why. Later they write:
"What I am not saying is that OpenAI will for sure collapse, or that generative AI will definitively fail"
What? Didn't they just explain 100 different reasons why they think think OpenAI will fail? There was also this:
"To be clear, this piece is focused on OpenAI rather than Generative AI as a technology — though I believe OpenAI's continued existence is necessary to keep companies interested/invested in the industry at all."
To be clear? So they are trying to separate OpenAI from gen AI. Then they throw in a hyphen and say, oh but without OpenAI, companies would stop spending time and money on gen AI. Ok, thank you for the..clarification.
"I ultimately believe that OpenAI in its current form is untenable."
Followed by a bunch of reasons why. Later they write:
"What I am not saying is that OpenAI will for sure collapse, or that generative AI will definitively fail"
What? Didn't they just explain 100 different reasons why they think think OpenAI will fail? There was also this:
"To be clear, this piece is focused on OpenAI rather than Generative AI as a technology — though I believe OpenAI's continued existence is necessary to keep companies interested/invested in the industry at all."
To be clear? So they are trying to separate OpenAI from gen AI. Then they throw in a hyphen and say, oh but without OpenAI, companies would stop spending time and money on gen AI. Ok, thank you for the..clarification.
I stopped reading after that.