Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In short, Google bureacratized them almost to death over Google Drive access, and then offered up a solution where they pay KPMG for an annual audit.

But the audit would cost them two months of revenue, every year.

So:

> So, as of today, we’re not just accepting our frozen-in-carbonite fate. We’re embracing it. We’re going to take the app offline.

By making a native app, you're donating free developer time to the platform owner. If they're not making it worth it for you, screw them.



To some extent, if you can’t afford a yearly audit, you can’t afford unlimited access to users sensitive documents. It’s much like handling credit card data or toxic waste. Most people and small orgs should avoid it at all costs.

Thankfully Google offers a lot of less risky permission scopes that don’t require audits.


Yeah that seems totally fair. How many users really intend to give full access to an app made by someone that can't afford $500/year? Most non-devs would be sketched out




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: