They started. But as the article mentions, that happened amidst a drought and the beginning of the war, which destroyed distribution.
> slave economy was also unable to supply its army with shoes, uniforms, guns, cannons, powder, etc.
Sure. Not arguing for the strength of the Southern economy. Just pointing out that their farms were more efficient. But not because of slaves. Because of the thing this article is about.
They started. But as the article mentions, that happened amidst a drought and the beginning of the war, which destroyed distribution.
> slave economy was also unable to supply its army with shoes, uniforms, guns, cannons, powder, etc.
Sure. Not arguing for the strength of the Southern economy. Just pointing out that their farms were more efficient. But not because of slaves. Because of the thing this article is about.