Without the "moral high ground", there's no way anyone would listen to someone pulling a "pot calling the kettle black", "do as I say not as a I do", or whatever other phrase you like. Attempting to influence someone like that does nothing positive for your image
Hey, at least I didn’t use the Spanish version, that would have been even worse!
I’ll restate. Restricting analysis within national borders does not make scientific sense in many cases.
The arctic/boreal region studied in the link I gave is of prime interest to US/NASA because it contains Alaska, and Alaska is exposed to climate change in compelling ways, but it also includes about half of Canada because the processes there are the same and an integrated analysis makes more sense.
Ditto for the climate forcing from Saharan dust (https://earth.jpl.nasa.gov/emit). That instrument is interesting bc it was originally put up to observe land composition but it has also been a pathfinder for CH4 detection!
Finally,there are analogous biomes overseas that can be studied as what-if cases to see if our models work outside their original domain of application.
That is, a global measurement and a regional measurement? (Regional, with airborne and in situ for validation of the large scale measurement.)
And appropriate global and regional studies? They are highly synergistic! Maybe something integrated like:
https://above.nasa.gov/about.html?#questions