Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>What is it that you have to hide?

An argument so cliche, it has its own Wikipedia page[1]. In the US, we currently have a presidential candidate from a major party threatening harm to people based on their political, social, and biological qualities, which outsiders often determine by inference from data such as who people are in contact with and where they travel. Further, I would argue the need for individual privacy is innate in humans; as every child matures they find a need to do things without their parents over their shoulder, even without their peers, no matter how innocent the activity and it is a need that does not vanish in adulthood. We generally agree that things like removing bedroom doors as punishment is abusive because it robs the person of privacy. The same goes for installing monitoring software on your partner's phone, or a GPS tracker on their car. Privacy means we are able to be ourselves without our lives being scrutinized, criticized, judged, rated, shamed, blamed, or defamed by every person on the street. I close the door when I defecate, I draw the blinds when I copulate, I don't tell people my passwords, and I don't scan my grocery receipt to earn points because there are some things other people don't need to know.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument#Criti...



[flagged]


Lol. So who does "deserve" privacy your highness? I'm guessing you do at the very least since you seem so judgemental on those with an "incessant, insatiable need to broadcast their lives 24/7" - which you presumably do not.

You're pretty judgy and seem incapable of even conceptualising a nuanced position on this topic. And your take on Assange, Snowden and Appelbaum is clearly first order trolling.

Unless you forgot the /s at the end of your whole comment.


"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." [0]

[0] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#1750s


I'm not sure how you mean that, but I take it to be kinda opposite to the position you're espousing?

I.e. you want people to give up some essential Liberty (privacy[1]) in return for some increased Safety (from "criminals and terrorists").

So, that Franklin quote seems pro-privacy, to me.

But maybe I misunderstand you ::shrug::

[1] that is: freedom to live one's life without fear of the constant scrutiny and judgement of others




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: