Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s a desktop, so plugging in a USB external hard drive isn’t too painful or expensive.


It's a major hassle and if you are going to get a small box to plug in all kinds of other small box around it with a web of cables, you might as well get a bigger box and put it all inside...

mini-ITX case start around 3L nowadays...


Dockers can’t run off external drives.


That's an interesting claim. An external drive is just another block device. Is this something you experienced?


Why? Thunderbolt is PCI-E. There shouldn't be any difference between TB attached storage and adding disks to a desktop tower.


This doesn’t seem to be true, and I don’t even get what it would change if it were true. Developers aren’t the target demographic of the base version with low storage.


Docker on Mac works fine on external drive. I moved the storage volume on a rotating USB 3 drive.


That's news to me, who's doing it right now on my imac m1.


Since macOS is a UNIX system, can’t you just use a symlink to the external drive or is there something specific about Docker that prevents this?


Docker in macOS (at least the useful one) just runs in a Linux VM, and I don't see why you couldn't run a VM off an image on an external drive. Maybe the UI doesn't let you select that location?


Which is a Linux and Windows technology anyway, so better buy something that offers first class support for them.


> Which is a Linux and Windows technology anyway

This is quite possibly the dumbest comment I have ever read on Hacker News. Congratulations!


Sure it can!




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: