Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If you were my boss and did this I'd be going to my skip manager to complain.



It sounded like an optional request not a command. I’ve managed and I’ve been managed and the relationship ships I’ve built along the way are deep enough to have conversations like these. We’re doing life with this people it’s not a dystopian novel about capitalism. If you have a genuine person as your boss moments like these help form friendships, and don’t feel like a dark Dilbert comic.

Friendships increase team communicability which bolster project success.


An "optional request" in a public group setting like that is not optional. You were non-optionally forced to respond to the challenge one way or another. If you don't share, then you're the guy who opted not to share. It turns off the touchy feely types who like it and don't understand the problem and can be "not a team player" fodder for anyone who wants it.

The actual respectful and considerate way is not to put people in such positions in the first place.

Like asking something from someone where it would be some unusual imposition or favor (like something that would be ok to ask a friend or family but not a mere aquaintance) and telling them it's ok if they say no. That is an empty statement. You were not supposed to put them in the position where they had to say no.

You can allow for people to not be robots without putting other people into awkward positions they didn't deserve to be put in.

It's definitely favoring some people at the expense of others. Like the gp comment, now they not only have to do their normal job, they also have to generate bs for their manager. The manager should be the one who has to figure out how to work with their different people, not the other way around. That is the managers explicit role that they supposedly get paid more for and what gives them the authority to manage and judge anyone else. That's their actual job rather than coding or whatever. Instead, they are making their team members all conform to them, on top of their actual jobs which are supposed to be something other than managing people.


Everything in life is optional.


A manager asking you to do something is never “just” an optional request


They absolutely can be. You can push back against your manager.


Still, you'd rather save your push back privileges - which come with a cost - for something actually important and work-related. Not for random crap like that, being put on the spot randomly in a personal way.


Use it and get more pushback power plus get caution when manager approaches. Getting labelled get can benefits and negatives.


I said no to things and world did not ended. You absolutely can say no. If you can't, you need to change the team or job.


> Friendships increase team communicability which bolster project success.

I've read that, too, e.g. something from Google about psychological safety.

It seems to me that these "be 10% more vulnerable" increases safety / friendship for some people,

but decreases it for others who don't want to share anything.

Maybe there's better ways to go about increasing psychological safety ... For example, about Psychological Safety on Wikipedia:

> Two aspects of leadership have been shown to be particularly instrumental in creating a psychologically safe team. They are leaders using:

> Participatory management > Inclusive management

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_safety

Here's a nice comment (in this discussion): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42026278


Thank you for this comment. I know the US is different from where I live, but the distrust shown in other comments just made me very depressed.


This has nothing to do with it. I'm not from the US and I find this deeply unprofessional.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: