Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> they want to be associated with "Faang" and yet their product is not really technology based.

You lost me. Netflix built a massive CDN, a recommendation engine, did dynamic transcoding of video, and a bunch of other things, at scale, quite some years before everyone else. They may have enshittified in the last five years, but I dont see any reason why they dont have a genuinely legitimate claim to being a founder member of the FAANG club.

I have a much harder time believing that companies with AI in their name or domain are doing any kind of AI, by contrast.



Same thing was done a little later by HBO, Disney and a plethora of others, which points to the task not really being uber-difficult.


Speaking as a consumer, Netflix’s solution is objectively better than it’s competitors. It handles network blips better, it’s more responsive to use, it has far fewer random bugs you need to work around.

You can argue whether or not that edge translates into more revenue, but the edge is objectively there.


Agree. Hulu, HBO/Max, and Disney Plus each do most of these:

- frequently decide that episodes I've watched are either completely unwatched (with random fully watched eps of the show mixed in).

- seemingly every time I leave at the start of the end-credits, I surely must have intended to come back and watch them.

- rebuild the entire interface (progressively, slowly) when I've left the tab unfocussed for too long. Instead of letting continue where I was, they show it for less than a second, the rebuild the world.

- keep resetting the closed-caption setting to "none", regardless of choosing "always" or "on instant replay"; worse, they sometimes still have the correct setting in the interface, but have disabled captions anyway.

Netflix has only once since they started streaming forgotten playback position or episode completion. They politely suggest when to reload the page (via a tiny footer banner), but even that might not appear for months. They usually know where end-credits really start, and count that as completion. They don't seem to mess with captions.


Hard to speak "objectively" as a consumer who has their own regional biases and knows none of the sausage underneath.

Maybe you're in a rural area and Netflix scaled gracefully. Maybe you're deep in SF and Netflix simply outspent to give minimal disruption to a population hub. These could both be true but don't speak to what performs better overall.


Based on my experience as a client, they’re not as reliable, Disney in particular. I thought it was a solved problem but it’s not apparently.


Pornhub has better, more reliable technology than Netflix, yet you don't see their tech blog very often do you?


PH has to stream for 20 seconds on average while boxing match is a lot longer :-)


Sounds like a consumer issue ;)


fair.

I have always wondered how do they deliver their content and what goes on behind the scenes and nobody on tech twitter or even youtubers talk about pornhub's infra for some reason. A lot of the innovation in tech has roots in people wanting to see high quality tiddies on the internet.


I worked on PH infra for a few years -

* The frontend itself runs on bare metal

* A lot of the backend was built out as microservices, running on top of Mesos and then later K8s

* CDN was in-house. The long tail is surprisingly long, but the front page videos were cached globally

The unifying theme behind PH is that they host everything on their own equipment, no AWS/GCP involved.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: