Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Depends on a definition of “many”. Trump is regarded as a great leader by “many”. I guess the sets have a big intersection?


You might even say a majority.


>You might even say a majority.

One might, but that would be incorrect. Trump received ~77,000,000 votes[0], which was 49.9% of the votes cast. As such, plurality is the appropriate term in this case.

What's more, there were ~240,000,000 eligible voters and ~161,000,000 registered voters at the time of the 2024 election.[1]

So the winner received less than a majority of votes cast by a small margin, and less so among registered voters (~48%) and even less so among eligible voters (32%).

[0] https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqne...

[1] https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/election-explained-ho...


Fair point, A plurality indeed.


Trump received the majority of casted votes.

People would agree that the Labour government in Britain received the majority of votes in the recent UK elections.

But they had only received 33.7% of casted votes. Which is 20% among eligible voters.

Majority = a greater number


>Trump received the majority of casted votes.

Majority: (n.):[0]

   1: a number or percentage equaling more than half of a
      total

      a majority of voters

      a two-thirds majority
N.B.: Donald Trump received 49.9% of total votes cast. That is (by the American definition -- we don't follow your rules) a plurality, not a majority.

Feel free to quibble about whose definition is correct. I'm sure the King will richly reward you for defending his English.

[0] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority

Edit: Fixed formatting.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: