First, the article is not subjective. While the article does not have a table of figures and hypothesis tests, the author presents a credible explanation for his experience. So, you can't necessarily critique his evidence, but you can critique and discuss his rational.
Second, the article you posted is not a counter argument. If anything, it bolsters the original article's claim. Your article says that when Christianity is mixed with the local animistic religions, the result is bad, especially when money is added. This is not the same as saying African's don't need God. Instead, it implies they need the Christian understanding of God.
Second, the article you posted is not a counter argument. If anything, it bolsters the original article's claim. Your article says that when Christianity is mixed with the local animistic religions, the result is bad, especially when money is added. This is not the same as saying African's don't need God. Instead, it implies they need the Christian understanding of God.