Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In theory, communism is the opposite - the stated goal of Lenin was a state that would wither away as people moved to voluntary self-government.

In practice, it turns into authoritarianism very different from the idealized goal.




Yes. "A communist state" is an oxymoron. Communism is by definition stateless. Government/governance, sure, but without a state. Rojava would probably be a better example of communism (in practice) than Soviet.


"state" is area where government is able to collect taxes and respected by other governments. Thus "communist state" is not oxymoron.


I don't understand your point.

> A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state (or nation state).[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism


I was born in communist country. No money, only objective points to describe cost of production and egibility, no police but militia, one "united" workers party and tax in nature and goods. But no money ;D and no state ;D


no state(s) means one state which you can't escape so you must obey




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: