> if you believe parallel construction was needed, I suppose you are also acknowledging the intel was good.
No. It says if the information was good (which we don’t know) it can still be explained by the program being a facade to launder sources and it wouldn’t be a proof of RV working.
I would rather read a proper experiment with controls published in a peer reviewed journal. If it works it can’t be hard to demonstrate that in a rigorous manner.
Hahah, more likely that to save admitting RV was real they'd need parallel construction to launder the RV data. But I applaud your inventive fantasy gymnastics in protecting your prior beliefs from the dangerous ideas of psi/RV.
> I would rather read a proper experiment with controls published in a peer reviewed journal. If it works it can’t be hard to demonstrate that in a rigorous manner.
A reminder to all here, please don't keep arguing sans experience, when that's the key thing to inform you. Just get the experience, and report back if you care to share! :)
If it worked, you could hypothetically find a webcam in a known location and rip the stream.
Without watching the stream as it is being ripped, you would do your remote viewing thing.
Do that for a period of time, making notes and timestamps. Then, go back and compare the notes against the stream.
The fact that something so monumentally earthshaking to our knowledge of physics/biology/etc. has not had anyone do this very simple exercise in our modern era suggests it is charitably self-delusion, and uncharitably intentionally propagated bunk and hokum.
Hahaha! This is quite inventive fantasy gymnastics to protect your apparent "prior beliefs" that psi/RV is impossible based on humanity's clearly "Godlike" command of all reality and the laws that govern it. Hahaha :)
However, I sense your deception - you actually believe this is real and have some experience (tho maybe difficult for you to process?)
So in light of that, your inventive fantasy was merely for sport. How without morals! Don't you know that new (in this environment) ideas like this should be protected and nurtured? Sure, takes some cojones to do so, but I see you are no retiring wallflower when it comes to enduring social ostracism, so why not channel your courageous individualism into something actually good (and true!), huh?
If inclined you could even construct an app to run these types of targets. There are a few RV apps that do daily practice, but your idea is new.
And please, unless you are too arrogant that you already know all about that, try for yourself by following the "Introduction" ( https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/184cl9k/star... ) and going to the beginner's guide link in the "How can I try it out?" section of that.
I believe they also have regular public targets, so you could try that too. I have a feeling you'd actually be really good at this. I'd love to hear if you tried and posted back here :)
No. It says if the information was good (which we don’t know) it can still be explained by the program being a facade to launder sources and it wouldn’t be a proof of RV working.
> Just head over to https://reddit.com/r/remoteviewing and follow the FAQ to try a session. See how you go!
I would rather read a proper experiment with controls published in a peer reviewed journal. If it works it can’t be hard to demonstrate that in a rigorous manner.