> that having nothing to hide means you have nothing to fear
hopefully the US turning from leader of the free world to Russia's tool will give them the kick they need to realise that just because you trust the government now doesn't mean you trust the next government or the one after it.
You probably don't want to look up which US President tried to force Apple to insert an encryption back door into iPhones back in 2015.
However, Google did only start moving to protect location data from subpoenas after people started to worry that location data could be used as a legal weapon against women who went to an abortion clinic, so your larger point stands.
That would be none, as it was the FBI, operating independently (as it's supposed to), which tried to force the issue. They even tried to go to Congress but found little support for their stunt. I'm not even sure Obama ever spoke in support of the backdoor, much less used any political power to make it a reality.
Haven't we already learned that gaslighting the public is counterproductive?
President Obama sold himself as a Constitutional scholar who would set right the civil liberties overreach of his predecessor.
You aren't going to convince sane people that his executive branch agencies sought to gut the fourth amendment without his being aware of it, despite months of extensive press coverage.
"the other side is just as bad" isn't the justification that a lot of people seem to think it is. if you don't like what the other side has done, don't just copy them. do better.
It's simpler. If you claim that a particular action would be bad if the other political team were to perform it, don't suddenly make excuses for that very same action if it turns out that your favored political team has previously performed it.
Points about Russia or partisan politics aside, there are now at least 10M people living in the US who have a very strong incentive to hide all their data from the executive branch. That's to say nothing of the countless millions who might want to help them.
The demand for encryption just exploded, in a legal gray area (city, state, and federal laws seem to be in conflict here) it's just a question of whether governments allows the supply to follow.
He demands $500bn of rare earth minerals, insists that Ukraine started the war by getting invaded and wants Zelensky to be replaced by a Russian puppet. It's amazing how the US went from the defender of the free world to just another thug.
what do you call US nukes in Europe? that's exactly what it was - Pax Americana, 70 years of peace and prosperity has come to an end for most countries. Now Russia has an ally in their old enemy.
Dude. Learn some history if you think Europe had peace for 70 years. I'll help, Google Yugoslavia. Also, Google all the wars or "interventions" that NATO/US did all around the world.
It's truly repulsive how imperialistic warmongerers like you pretend you're "the good guys".
hopefully the US turning from leader of the free world to Russia's tool will give them the kick they need to realise that just because you trust the government now doesn't mean you trust the next government or the one after it.