Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The HN demographic can follow that but many normies can't because Facebook provides functionality for sharing that can't be replicated by email mailing lists / RSS readers / Mastodon / vBulletin, phpBB boards, etc.

Then normies should not actively be trying to make the service that is indispensable to them non-viable.

Either you need to use it, in which case you should not try to sabotage it, or you don't, in which case you should not need to sabotage it. So what is the point of attempting to sabotage it?




>to sabotage it?

I don't understand your choice of the word "sabotage". The thread's article is telling users about the official Facebook approved ways to turn off some ad preferences. This isn't UBlock, or Pi-Hole, AdNauseum, etc.

Similar to official Google method to turn off some ads settings in Chrome: https://www.techlicious.com/images/computers/chrome-enhanced...

If users have those 3 advertising settings in Chrome turned off, is that also "sabotage"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: