It turns out that success is composed of 90% luck, 10% marketing, and 5% talent/technical advantage. A rhetorical question: how do you entice people to turn a movement into a revolution when it isn't likely the movement will succeed?
Another rhetorical question: out of luck/marketing/technical advantage, which one is contributing the most to the extra 5% out of 105% of all the components success can be attributed to?
