Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It's like the difference between a 80286 and a 80386: The latter added the hardware support for true multitasking that the former lacked.

I'm not sure this is a good comparison. The 286 did support true multitasking in protected mode, and it was used in many non-DOS operating systems. What the 386 added (among other things) is the virtual 8086 mode which allowed it to multitask existing real mode DOS applications that accessed hardware directly.



Sorry, I'm a bit late responding. You're right! I should have used 8086 and 80286 as the example. 386 added virtual memory and some other stuff.

Thanks




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: