I remember a male and female specialist, whatever their discipline, holding a media scrum a decade ago.
They pleaded for people to understand that men and women are physically different, including the brain, its neurological structure, and that this was in modern medicine being overlooked for political reasons.
One of the results was that many clinical trials and studies were populated by males only. The theory being that they are less risk adverse, and as "there is no difference", then who cares?
Well these two cared, and said that it was hurting medical outcomes for women.
I wonder, if this AI issue is a result of this. Fewer examples of female bodies and brains, fewer studies and trials, means less data to match on...
They pleaded for people to understand that men and women are physically different, including the brain, its neurological structure, and that this was in modern medicine being overlooked for political reasons.
One of the results was that many clinical trials and studies were populated by males only. The theory being that they are less risk adverse, and as "there is no difference", then who cares?
Well these two cared, and said that it was hurting medical outcomes for women.
I wonder, if this AI issue is a result of this. Fewer examples of female bodies and brains, fewer studies and trials, means less data to match on...
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/07/sex-differenc...