Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"They continue to fabricate links, references, and quotes, like they did from day one." - "I ask them to give me a source for an alleged quote, I click on the link, it returns a 404 error."

Why have these companies not manually engineered out a problem like this by now? Just do a check to make sure links are real. That's pretty unimpressive to me.

There are no fabricated links, references, or quotes, in OpenAI's GPT 4.5 + Deep Research.

It's unfortunate the cost of a Deep Research bespoke white paper is so high. That mode is phenomenal for pre-work domain research. You get an analyst's two week writeup in under 20 minutes, for the low cost of $200/month (though I've seen estimates that white paper cost OpenAI over USD 3000 to produce for you, which explains the monthly limits).

You still need to be a domain expert to make use of this, just as you need to be to make use of an analyst. Both the analyst and Deep Research can generate flawed writeups with similar misunderstandings: mis-synthesizing, misapplication, or missing inclusion of some essential.

Neither analyst nor LLM is a substitute for mastery.




While I agree, it doesn't stop business folks pushing for its use in area where it is inappropriate. That is, at least for me, part of the skepticism.


How do people in the future become domain experts capable of properly making use of it if they are not the analyst spending two weeks on the write-up today?


My complaints with Deep Research LLMs is they don't go deeper than 2 pages of SERPs. I want them to dig down obscure stuff, not list cursorily relevant peripheral directions. they just seem to do breadth first than depth first search.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: