Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah it is more profitable but revenues are way down.

In 2021, the last full year before Musk's acquisition, Twitter generated $5.08 billion in revenue.

Under Musk's ownership, X's revenue has declined significantly. In 2024, X reported $2.7 billion in revenue, which is nearly half of its pre-acquisition level. For 2025, global ad revenue is projected to grow to $2.26 billion, marking its first annual increase since the acquisition.

So yes on paper, X is more profitable than Twitter was before the acquisition. Its 2024 adjusted EBITDA nearly doubled Twitter’s best year, despite a much smaller revenue base. But whether that profitability is sustainable or comes at too high a cost—strategically, reputationally, and culturally—remains an open question.



You didn't actually show profitability here. I think if it were actually profitable, Musk would've hyped it up.


Ok, but how is that relevant? I'd much rather have a more profitable business than one with more top-line revenue.


Lol, who did the adjusting!? ... Good old "adjusted EBITDA".




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: