Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Journalist has all rights to write about it and perhaps mention enough to prove he's not without proof but not reveal as much as he did.

That's reckless.

Repeat - revealing sensitive info even if you come across by accident or someone's mistake is a crime. Esp national ones not just corporate secrets.



What information did they reveal that was sensitive? The strikes had already taken place and so nothing they shared had any strategic value after the fact, other than to confirm the validity. To be clear it is utterly fucking insane (borderline "Russian bot" talking point) that you are entertaining this line of reasoning and I feel dirty for even engaging you.


Ha the "Russian talking point" weapon! Never failed. Anyone that doesnt repeat what the ecosystem wants is Russian agent.

Kind of defeats the argument that content of messages will set back relations, affect future intelligence collection etc we kept hearing endlessly?!

Make up your mind. It's either important or not.


It's more like anyone who wants to dismantle the free press is a Russian agent in this case. Not really moved by your protest.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: