Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[EDIT: Found a link - https://artvoice.com/2025/03/10/witness-testimony-raises-que...]

    A particularly revealing aspect of Menchel’s cross-examination focused on Mr. Vovor’s feelings toward Ms. Javice. He admitted to sending her flowers, messages, photos, playlists, and even a card without signing his name, instead using a heart emoji. His behavior had previously led to a human resources complaint by Ms. Javice, resulting in a discussion with the company’s legal and Human Resources representative.
[EDIT: All of the below is now inaccurate]

> AFAIK, he did not deny that he made romantic overtures

Depends on how it's phrased - it's common to preface with "What's not explicitly addressed is denied. My Client reserves the right to address the unaddressed claim in the future." in court papers, but I'm not sure if that works for witness-box testimony.

TBH, if he neither denied it nor admitted it while in the witness box, then it is unlikely he was asked the question "Did you make any romantic overture to $X" at all.

And, to be even more honest, if her lawyer avoided asking that question, it's because he knew the answer already.

> (or whatever the hell phrase they used, i can look it up again if you care).

Actually I cannot find the court transcript (my google fu is failing). Do you have a link?

It seems a pretty important part of this thread's premise; assuming that the main witness [did/did not] ask out his boss on a date.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: