Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OSD is god and gets to prescribe what is and is not open source? Says who?


The whole idea is that we need a definition that everyone agrees With. The OSD is what the software community at large agreed, so any licences that claim to be open-source are compared to that.


This doesn't match the Webster's definition either. If your response to that is "there are no gods anyways" then you've earned yourself a chuckle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: