Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm curious why you think it would be worse for everybody? This argument seems to depend on the assumption that if something makes AI less viable then the situation for human beings is worse overall. I don't think many actual people would accept that premise.



It's worse only if AI turns out to be of high value.

In that case only large companies that can afford to license training data will be dominant.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: