Does the site offer anything else besides bigger Dribbble shots of projects when looking for a designer? Like links to the actual product/website/iTunes store of the app made? I find myself having to manually google the apps of the shots so I can download and try out the app and see how it turned out. Maybe enforce a mandatory rule to include link to the actual product?
Or are the designers suppose to supply the links when they connect with the client? If so, why the run around?
And browsing through some of the designers, I learned that a few of them are no longer taking on freelance work once I visited their own portfolio/personal site.
Maybe all of the above are addressed when you post a project? I don't have a real project atm so can't try it out.
Looks promising! I'll definitely try it out for my next app. Need a sexy icon :)
Hey. I am the other cofounder. You are right, we should encourage more designers to link their works with actual applications. There is an option and some have, but we need to do that with more apps.
Like Jenn said, we'd love to help when you're ready to do an icon. Let us know and thanks for the comment.
Co-Founder here: Indeed, all of the above will be addressed when you post a project. Link to actual products and in fact much more contextual information is indeed in the works. We've got quite a few great icon designers - just let us know when you're ready :) Thanks for your feedback!
Quite different from Dribbble, our focus is on connecting customers to designers for projects, not show and tell among designers. Meer.li seems closer to Dribbble in that it appears to focus more on connecting mobile designers to mobile designers too.
Scoutzie is great! they connected me to the top designers in the world which i would never have access to. They put a lot of thought into matching us with the right people. Congrats!
Thank you so much! We understand and believe that design is integral to your product's success so we do everything we can to make sure we deliver the design you're looking for.
"Zubovsky and Toda insist that Scoutzie is more like a traditional design agency like FJORD or Happy Cog than its most obvious competitor 99Designs, and hold that the curation of the community and emphasis on quality versus getting the cheapest possible option is what sets them apart from the aforementioned."
I don't understand how they can compare Scoutzie to an agency. Do they not realize that agencies deliver significantly more than just design? An agency delivers a package through a proven process. Scoutzie just gives you a relationship to a designer. They are not even remotely the same.
Indeed! In your dealings with an agency, you might only have one designer working on your project. But (unless the agency is pretty bad) they should be getting input on their work from other designers (especially more senior designers in the firm). And if you really dislike their work, the possibility should exist that the agency will draft a different designer in.
Connecting users to a single freelancer isn't like being an agency. It is valuable, for sure - but agencies offer value in a different way.
Or are the designers suppose to supply the links when they connect with the client? If so, why the run around?
And browsing through some of the designers, I learned that a few of them are no longer taking on freelance work once I visited their own portfolio/personal site.
Maybe all of the above are addressed when you post a project? I don't have a real project atm so can't try it out.
Looks promising! I'll definitely try it out for my next app. Need a sexy icon :)