I’m disputing your claim that I am invoking a logical fallacy here.

Revoking access to life-critical medical care that is specific to one’s sex is indisputably making the people of a given sex less safe.

Threatening to persecute people who wish to assist women in pursuing life-critical medical care is making women less safe.

If medical care specific to one’s sex cannot be considered protecting the safety of someone on the basis of their sex, what is?